Current:Home > ScamsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -NextFrontier Finance
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Poinbank View
Date:2025-04-10 10:07:33
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (41)
Related
- 'Most Whopper
- Which 40 states don't tax Social Security benefits?
- Staff at a Virginia wildlife center pretend to be red foxes as they care for an orphaned kit
- Reba McEntire turns for superfan L. Rodgers on 'The Voice' in emotional audition: 'Meant to be'
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- How Jordan Peele gave Dev Patel his 'Pretty Woman' moment with struggling 'Monkey Man'
- No, Aaron Rodgers and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., shrooms and Hail Marys do not a VP pick make
- Israel likely to face Hamas resistance for years to come, U.S. intelligence assessment says
- John Galliano out at Maison Margiela, capping year of fashion designer musical chairs
- American-Israeli IDF soldier Itay Chen confirmed to have died during Hamas' Oct. 7 terror attack
Ranking
- Olympic men's basketball bracket: Results of the 5x5 tournament
- 3 women and dog found dead, man fatally shot by police in North Las Vegas: Police
- Sauce Gardner says former teammate Mecole Hardman 'ungrateful' in criticizing Jets
- Who was John Barnett? What to know about the Boeing employee and his safety concerns
- 3 years after the NFL added a 17th game, the push for an 18th gets stronger
- Can women and foreigners help drive a ramen renaissance to keep Japan's noodle shops on the boil?
- The 10 Best Places to Buy Spring Wedding Guest Dresses Both Online & In-Store
- Gymshark 70% Off Deals Won’t Be Here for Long: Save Big, Train Hard
Recommendation
3 years after the NFL added a 17th game, the push for an 18th gets stronger
Over 6 million homeowners, many people of color, don't carry home insurance. What can be done?
Republican senators reveal their version of Kentucky’s next two-year budget
TEA Business College’s Mission and Achievements
Kourtney Kardashian Cradles 9-Month-Old Son Rocky in New Photo
UFC Hall of Famer Mark Coleman 'battling for his life' after saving parents from house fire
U.S. giving Ukraine $300 million in weapons even as Pentagon lacks funds to replenish stockpile
For NFL running backs, free agency market is active but still a tough bargain