Current:Home > ScamsNew labor rule could be a big deal for millions of franchise and contract workers. Here's why. -NextFrontier Finance
New labor rule could be a big deal for millions of franchise and contract workers. Here's why.
View
Date:2025-04-14 19:19:44
Millions of workers at some of the biggest U.S. employers could gain sweeping new rights under a new federal labor rule set to take effect by year-end.
The final rule, announced Thursday by the National Labor Relations Board, would classify companies such as franchisees and contractors as an employer if they control basic conditions of work such as pay, scheduling and supervision. In a stroke, that would make fast-food giants, retailers, technology players, staffing firms and many other businesses that hire workers on a contract basis more accountable for violations of labor law, one expert told CBS MoneyWatch.
"The new rule is enormously important and could bolster the rights of millions of employees," John Logan, chair of labor and employment studies at San Francisco State University, told CBS MoneyWatch.
The so-called joint employer rule replaces one enacted during the Trump administration that required companies to have "direct and immediate" control over contract and franchise workers to be considered joint employers. Labor advocates contend the present standard gave companies an escape route for violations of labor law.
"Under the previous standard, it was too easy for corporations to claim they weren't responsible for violations of workers' rights and almost impossible to hold accountable," Logan said.
Companies that are classified as joint employers under the new rule could now be made to take part in collective bargaining, for instance.
Industry pushback
NLRB Chair Lauren McFerran said the board took "a legally correct return to common-law principles" in crafting the rule, which takes effect on December 26.
The regulation is opposed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Retail Association (NRA), with both indicating that they could challenge the rule in court.
"It defies common sense to say that businesses can be held liable for workers they don't employ at workplaces they don't own or control, yet that is exactly what the new NLRB joint-employer rule does," Glenn Spencer, the group's senior vice president for the employment division, said in a statement. "This rule will create chaos and more legal confusion that will harm both employers and workers. The U.S. Chamber will carefully evaluate our options going forward, including litigation."
The NRA reiterated its opposition to the new standard, calling it "unclear, unnecessary and harmful to thousands of retail employers and the millions of Americans they employ."
American Hotel & Lodging Association President & CEO Chip Rogers called the LNRB's new rule "devastating to the hotel industry and the millions of people we employ," and accused the agency of trying to dismantle the franchise business model to "artificially increase unionization."
Sens. Joe Manchin, D.-W. Va. and Bill Cassidy, R.-La., say they'll introduce a resolution to overturn the rule, Politico reported.
veryGood! (76979)
Related
- US Open player compensation rises to a record $65 million, with singles champs getting $3.6 million
- Agent: Tori Bowie, who died in childbirth, was not actively performing home birth when baby started to arrive
- Trump indictment timeline: What's next for the federal documents case?
- Can you bond without the 'love hormone'? These cuddly rodents show it's possible
- Drones warned New York City residents about storm flooding. The Spanish translation was no bueno
- The Nipah virus has a kill rate of 70%. Bats carry it. But how does it jump to humans?
- The Nipah virus has a kill rate of 70%. Bats carry it. But how does it jump to humans?
- The EPA Once Said Fracking Did Not Cause Widespread Water Contamination. Not Anymore
- Golf's No. 1 Nelly Korda looking to regain her form – and her spot on the Olympic podium
- Oklahoma Tries Stronger Measures to Stop Earthquakes in Fracking Areas
Ranking
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- The Fed is taking a break in hiking interest rates. Here's why.
- Activist Alice Wong reflects on 'The Year of the Tiger' and her hopes for 2023
- Court Throws Hurdle in Front of Washington State’s Drive to Reduce Carbon Emissions
- Golf's No. 1 Nelly Korda looking to regain her form – and her spot on the Olympic podium
- Muslim-American opinions on abortion are complex. What does Islam actually say?
- Democratic Candidates Position Themselves as Climate Hawks Going into Primary Season
- 6.8 million expected to lose Medicaid when paperwork hurdles return
Recommendation
Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
Woman, 28, arrested for posing as 17-year-old student at Louisiana high school
Anne Heche Laid to Rest 9 Months After Fatal Car Crash
Helen Mirren Brings the Drama With Vibrant Blue Hair at Cannes Film Festival 2023
PHOTO COLLECTION: AP Top Photos of the Day Wednesday August 7, 2024
Keith Urban Accidentally Films Phoebe Bridgers and Bo Burnham Kissing at Taylor Swift's Concert
Analysis: Can Geothermal Help Japan in Crisis?
Friday at the beach in Mogadishu: Optimism shines through despite Somalia's woes